Blog Post #2: Society's construction of social media
In
Baym’s second chapter, Making new media
made sense, she provides an in depth analysis of each perspective regarding
the causal relationship between technology and the social. In the case of
Katherine Pommerening; however, I believe the social construction of technology
(SCOT) perspective best describes the anxieties Katherine faces in relation to
new media and interactivity. The social construction of technology perspective
states that social factors influence the invention of new technologies, arguing
that “a wide
range of social, economic, governmental, and cultural factors influence how
people take up and use media” (Baym, 2016, p.46). It also discusses how the
original intention to develop a technology can be modified by social groups
with other interests and needs. For example, the internet’s original intention
was to be a tool for the military, but as we know today, its function has
shifted drastically from that to a platform of communication.
Derived from the internet, social media platforms have heightened the
necessity we all feel to remain in contact with people near and far. Katherine
Pommerening is a prime example of this. She is constantly glued to her phone
and the applications within, to the point where she is unaware of the world
around her. Her anxieties revolve around this “necessity” to be connected and
her fear of missing out. Baym also discusses the influence of peers on the
behaviours and attitudes of media users and their perceptions of media uses. “Katherine
Pommerening’s iPhone is the place where all of her friends are always hanging
out. So, it’s the place where she is, too. She’s on it after it rings to wake
her up in the mornings. She’s on it at school, when she can sneak it…” (Contrera,
2016). Katherine doesn’t want to miss out on what her friends are doing online,
I even feel this same anxiety when I am not using my phone for a certain amount of
time. In addition to the anxieties provoked for young users, there are also
anxieties for their parents. The idea of moral panic is brought up in the text;
it focuses on the well-being of children and teenage girls in relation to
exposure to inappropriate material. This is something Katherine’s father became
anxious about when he learns of her extensive social media use.
Furthermore, society has put pressure on how to
properly represent yourself online. A “like” or comment on Instagram, for
example, has become a symbol of popularity. Katherine describes this phenomenon when she
says “Over 100 likes is good, for me. And comments. You just comment to make a
joke or tag someone… The ones that don’t get enough likes, don’t have good
enough lighting or don’t show the coolest moments in her life must be deleted.”
(Contrera, 2016). She turns to social media as a place for validation and
acceptance, like many people do, and if this validation is not enough, she gets
rid of a post altogether. Western society has made technologies such as the
mobile phone and social media a crucial aspect of our lives to the point where
it has become the norm, forcing members of society to conform and participate
in order to fit in. Katherine Pommerening is only one example of how society
has constructed technologies as mediums of communication, validation and interactivity
in which anxieties are provoked.
References:
Baym, N. K. (2015). Making new media make sense. In Personal
Connections in the Digital Age (2nd
ed., pp. 44-51). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Contrera, Jessica. (2016). “This Is What It's like to Grow up in the Age
of Likes, Lols and Longing.” The
Washington Post, WP Company, www.washingtonpost.com/sf/style/2016/05/25/13-right-now-this-is-what-its-like-to-grow-up-in-the-age-of-likes-lols-and-longing/?utm_term=.f08640736a75.
Comments
Post a Comment